Sunday, 30 July 2017

Buddy Rich 1917-1987

This year marks the centenary of the birth of Buddy Rich, a musician who was a key formative influence and to whom I owe my lifelong affinity with big band music.

The following is a piece I wrote for the American publication Not So Modern Drummer and is reproduced with permission of the copyright holder.


BUDDY RICH
 
 

 

 

Buddy Rich’s playing is something that goes beyond subjective appraisal. Even to the man in the street with no knowledge of drums or jazz music it was self evident that you were witnessing greatness. This alone puts him in a very special category; virtuosity which can communicate with a mass audience.

 

Let’s get one thing clear right from the start. If you play the drums and were not even slightly influenced by Buddy Rich there’s a strong possibility that you inadvertently took up the wrong instrument. Don’t be too despondent though, as a great many drummers are influenced by Buddy without even being particularly aware of it. As with Krupa he influenced a whole generation of players who in turn went on to inspire the next generation of players who in turn influence the players of today. These musicians wrote the DNA code of drumming which is common to us all, and don’t you forget it.

 

For me it all started very early. My parents were in their early 30s when I was born in 1963, and they had been raised on a musical diet of big bands, jazz, and popular singers of the Sinatra school. Their tastes were fully formed well in advance of Rock Around the Clock. They had no time for the new musical trend and found it simplistic by comparison to what they were accustomed to. Don’t be fooled by the history books; regardless of the fact that Elvis’s baby left him, all the established musical styles continued much as they had done. They whole world didn’t suddenly re-tune to rock and roll overnight despite what the revisionists may want you to believe.

 

Having being born into a family where the popular jazz of the mid 60s (Brubeck, Oscar Peterson and the like) was very much at the top of the playlist was one of those lucky flukes of circumstance that go on to shape your destiny, added which my father was a very good semi professional drummer who had studied with a legendary Birmingham (UK) based Rich disciple named Tommy Webster. Added to which my mother came from a huge Irish family all of whom played instruments and sang, as is the tradition.

 

It was in early 1968 that the perfect storm broke.

 

Having taken the UK by storm the previous year (measured by audience reaction rather than ticket sales it has to be said) the Buddy Rich big band became staple listening fare for musicians of my father’s generation, and in order to listen to his LPs in the highest possible fidelity he spent £150 (a huge amount of money then) on a Bang and Olufsen ‘Beogram 1500’ record player. I had just turned five and had never heard anything quite like it. Speakers that stood as tall as I did at the time exploding with music reproduced with an immediacy, power and clarity the like of which I had not previously experienced. From that moment Buddy’s name was added to my list of identifiable jazz drummers that already included Joe Morello, Shelley Manne and Cozy Cole. 

 

Seeing is Believing 

The exact date is unclear but the intensity of the moment is as powerful as it was roughly forty-five years ago, when quite unexpectedly Buddy appeared on a talk show on British television. It was called ‘Magpie’ and was broadcast on ITV, then the UK’s only commercial network and was aimed at hip youngsters, (the squares were watching ‘Blue Peter’ on BBC). No band, just some chat and a drum solo. 

Ka-boom!! 

I ran upstairs and started woodshedding and haven’t stopped. There’s a profundity about those formative influences when your knowledge is in its infancy, and you’re still so youthfully idealistic to believe that you can achieve anything, and whilst I had been listening to jazz drumming on records since my earliest days the impact of the moving image closed the deal. Later that evening my mother, who had witnessed my enthusiasm, commented to my father, “That’s it, he’s going to be a drummer”, more with resignation than enthusiasm if I’m honest.

 

 

I invested a disproportionately large percentage of my teenage years trying to come up with ideas that resembled the kind of things I had heard Buddy play. At that point not the greatest reader of notation and never having seen the merit of transcribing I set about this Herculean task by listening only, as this was just prior to the VHS/Betamax explosion, and all I had to check my work against was fleeting glimpses of Buddy’s hands seeing him on television or playing live a couple of times each year. Adolescence brought with it the chance to play big band jazz for real and I was afforded the opportunity to put my hours of practice before an audience. My fellow drummers all talked about Buddy, but players of other instruments would talk about Mel Lewis, from which I concluded that to occupy a hypothetical middle ground between their two contrasting styles might be a good plan. 

It was/is.

 

Many times I have wondered, if Buddy had played a genre other then the big band jazz for which I knew him at the time, would the impact have been quite as strong?

 

Much as I was massively in awe John Bonham and particularly Ian Paice, the musical context of their playing didn’t move me half as much, and whilst my playing influences and wide ranging and almost incalculable, it is Buddy Rich and Buddy Rich alone to whom I owe my lifelong affinity with big band music. Rock and pop got me excited about the industry, but jazz, especially of the big band variety, made me want to play.

 

It’s worth remembering that the 70s produced a great deal of very good big band music. It was a time before post-modernism and forward thinking leaders and arrangers were keeping the music relevant. In addition to Buddy I soon discovered the then current incarnation of Woody Herman’s Herd, Maynard Ferguson, Stan Kenton, Thad/Mel, Don Ellis, Toshiko Akiyoshi, and a whole heap of top drawer American college bands from North Texas State One O’Clock Lab Band on downwards, but it was the music of the Buddy Rich Big band from 1966 onwards that provided the all-important gateway. That’s not to say that I didn’t develop an appreciation of Rich’s earlier work, but that would come later, and for all the excitement generated by the 1950s Verve imprints (play along with Verve Jam Session Vol 7 some time if you want to get a handle on swinging hard) for me it all begins with Swinging New Big Band.

 

The opening title, Bill Holman’s ‘Readymix’ is not so much an opening tune as a statement of intent. There’s almost a feeling of anger in Holman’s counterpoint and you hear a fresh, new orchestra with a point to prove. Buddy’s playing on this track in particular is like an accelerant, and sets fire to everything it touches. I love how he can sit on the front of the beat without speeding up (most of the time), but it’s a skill that big band drummers should use judiciously, and is perhaps best held in reserve for those days when you are meeting the band payroll yourself: suffice to say it doesn’t lend itself to an evening of melodies from the Glenn Miller era.

 

Now, let’s take a step further back in time to another Rich-led big band record date, ‘This One’s For Basie’. More than ten years prior to Swinging New Big Band but the 1966 Buddy Rich is a wildly more contemporary and hip sounding drummer then a decade previously. None of us can definitively say why (just like nobody knows quite how his left hand technique worked-videos with titles like ‘Buddy Rich’s Left Hand Technique Explained’ leave me somewhere between despairing and murderous; how Buddy’s left hand or for that matter any part of his playing worked is not the point, about which more later). The modernisation of style is self-evident. Was it the ascendancy of the likes of Joe Morello and Sonny Payne that made him dig deep into that vast reserve of talent to remind the young Turks of the status quo? (More than once I’ve heard it said of the Rich vs Roach session that Max finished in third place}. With nobody to answer these questions we have no choice but to resort to conjecture, but a listen through recordings of Buddy with Harry James between 1962 and 1966 clearly display a new stage in his evolution. The sound changes (thank you Remo!) and the unrelenting virtuosity of tracks like ‘Explosion’ (Chicago Opera House, October 2nd 1955) remains, but seems somehow tempered with space, more considered, (‘Caravan’ August 1961) and becomes even more dazzling as a result. There’s a live recording of King Porter Stomp recorded at Chicago’s Holiday Ballroom with the James band that epitomises rhythmic hipness by today’s standards. What that must have sounded like to the ears of 1964 we can only imagine.

 

Key to all this though, is whatever modernisation, self-reinvention, or whatever you want to call it took place, he’s still unmistakeably Buddy Rich. Only once briefly was this not the case, the truly dreadful Buddy-Rich-Plays-Disco abomination ‘Speak No Evil’ possibly BR’s sole significant lapse of integrity as a recording artist. In fairness he was by no means alone. Jazz musicians were fair game for record labels looking for a cash-in; records like this could be recorded quickly and relatively inexpensively and who knows? Surprise chart success couldn’t be entirely ruled out. In case you don’t know this recording and I’ve piqued your curiosity I say one word to you. Avoid. Others may cite the MCA record from the early 80s, but I actually rather like the chart of Never Can Say Goodbye, even if Buddy’s tom sound is such that he could have probably got a similar result from playing the empty cases.

 

Similarly, with only slight and usually short-lived variations he stuck to the same, no-nonsense, simple drum set layout. I remember in about 1980 some friends had been in New York and came back to the UK having seen Buddy at the Bottom Line. We were told that he was “using concert toms” and nightmarish images haunted my young mind of a marine pearl Quadra Plus outfit replacing the much-loved ‘Krupa’ configuration (for that’s what it was). Having being previously alarmed by Roy Haynes’s flirtation with concert toms could Buddy have gone down the same pathway? Happily, not.

 

This brings me to another point, and it’s an important one.

 

Rich’s virtuosity was often a soft target for the self appointed jazz intelligentsia, the British journalist (and sometime drummer) Richard Williams is amongst the worst offenders, and many such chin strokers have wasted much copy bandying about a relatively limited repertoire of clichéd, unfounded and shallow barbs, so allow me if you will to take a moment to torpedo a handful of these right now.

 

‘Buddy Rich didn’t invent anything he played, he merely took from others’.

 

The great consolidator, Buddy took the best of everything that his late 1930s peer group could do, rolled it all into one and did it better. His playing of that era is full of all kinds of influences, from Krupa to Chick Webb, Tony Briglia to Jo Jones. Philly Joe Jones did something similar a couple of decades later where he tool all the best bits of  bop’s founding fathers and assimilated them in his own recognisable style. We all do this; it’s called being influenced. Not only that, in later years there are a number of things that appear in his playing that are his alone, and owe little or nothing to what went before.


Groove playing. 

How many times have I heard drummers say; 

“Buddy Rich couldn’t play rock”.  

My recollection is that I never heard him play anything other than jazz with jazz musicians. If there exist bootlegs of him jamming with Jimi Hendix, Moby Grape, or the 1910 Fruitgum Company for that matter I am happy to be enlightened. The self proclaimed ‘too hip for Buddy Rich’ brigade of drummers of the time (I could name names!) were quick to accept the received wisdom about this aspect of his playing, a point of view which history has comprehensively disproved. Like much of the jazz/rock crossover drumming of the late 60s there is a strong element of improvisation in the time feels, an unrelenting straight beat would have been way too vanilla for the context of the music. And as for some of those breaks, just check out the call-and –answer shout chorus on ‘Love and Peace’. I know those two bar phrases inside out and they still sound incredible. Testimony to this is the amount of times Buddy’s breaks and fills have been sampled by more contemporary artists.

 

The Jazz Waltz 

Undoubtedly the Shaw and Dorsey orchestras would have played in 3/4 for dancing but the jazz waltz came into vogue from the late 50s. Having a far from encyclopaedic knowledge of the Harry James repertoire I can’t be completely certain but it’s a fair bet that Buddy probably didn’t play a jazz waltz until his late 40s. Jazz drummers of the day, tended to play jazz waltzes like ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and ‘Someday My Prince Will Come’ with space and a lightness of touch. Contrast this with Buddy’s four-limbed turbocharged approach. It’s like harmony on the drumset rather than time with a few left hand comments. You can hear it in development on ‘Willowcrest’ (that eight bar solo would change beyond recognition on later versions) and it was fully formed by the time of recording ‘Preach and Teach’, 'Goodbye Yesterday' and ‘Ode to Billie Joe’ just a year later.
 

Right until the end there was ongoing development. The last time I saw him play on his final UK tour in late 1986 he came onstage and rather than setting the tempo for the opener on the hi hat, he began to play the ride cymbal instead. Then with his left hand he unleashed continuous eighth notes with syncopated accents. It was breathtaking and he had proved the point yet again before anyone else on stage had even played a note.
 

Imitate then innovate 

Over the years I’ve seen a number of players who had Buddy’s style down cold, which is without doubt an extraordinary achievement however you look at it. For myself I’ve always had enough trouble sorting out my own solos never mind playing anyone else’s, but listening to Buddy and other early influences instilled in me the habit of reverse engineering, whereby I would strip back an idea I liked in order to get to the root of it, and then look at all sorts of different ways in which the idea could be extrapolated. I remember mixing a Buddy idea with one of Gary Chaffee’s concepts years and years ago and I still haven’t worn it out. Listen first, the listen some more and then learn how to learn. That’s the point.

 

I’ve never tired of those great big band records of the 60s, 70s and 80s considering that some of that music has been part of my life for nearly half a century. There isn’t much music that many people listened to through their childhood and adolescence that is still so cool. After he passed I didn’t listen for a very long time until the Pacific Jazz reissues appeared with all the missing tracks that we had known about for years, but that all changed about a decade ago.

 

Having a long established track record as a big band leader myself there had often been requests to play ‘hit’ tunes associated with other bands, and Buddy’s repertoire was always very close to the top of that list. Always I had resisted as my modus operandi as leader was to showcase new musicians playing and recording work by new or little-known writers.

 

That all changed in 2006 when I got calls to appear on a couple of drum shows, the condition being that the content would include some of ‘Buddy’s Greatest Hits’. So well received were these performances that Tony Bennett’s former manager Derek Boulton offered me a UK tour headlining in theatres if I was prepared to do something similar. How long do you think I took to consider that decision?
 

For my own amusement I ditched the double bass drum pedal and secondary ride cymbal and got hold of a period correct set of Slingerlands for that cool, classic look. I don’t consider myself a ‘heritage’ player and big band accounts for probably only about fifteen percent of my work as a freelance professional but to have been gifted with opportunities like these helped me to connect with all the reasons I wanted to learn to play in the first place, something which every player should always keep in mind.
 

In conclusion a personal reminiscence
 

Years ago the BBC used to run an annual big band competition, and as well as winning bands there were prizes awarded to individual players, so it was quite a coup aged just 16 to be awarded with the Jack Parnell prize for best drummer. This was quite prestigious and I was featured in the newspapers, on television and radio. A few months after all this palaver Buddy’s band were playing in the UK and I went to the concert in Nottingham. The promoter knew me because of my recent glancing brush with success and arranged for me to meet Buddy prior to the concert. To my embarrassment the concert promoter proceeded to regale Buddy with full details of my recent achievements and alleged prowess. Buddy very graciously congratulated me, and asked if I would like to sit in (!)
 

I knew he had hung one or two over confident young players out to dry so thinking quickly I responded thus; 

“Oh no, these people have come to listen to you, they don’t want to hear me”. 

He gave me that look, wished me luck in the industry and then went out and played with a casual, almost nonchalant virtuosity, which no one who ever saw him at the peak of his powers will ever forget.

 

Thank you Buddy Rich. If it hadn’t have been for you, I wouldn’t be me.

Monday, 17 July 2017

And Now, For Younger Viewers......


When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me, so goes the oft quoted passage from the First Book of Corinthians, which was not written by J K Rowling in case you don't know.

Mainstream news media, especially the absurdly bloated national broadcaster, have been going big on the latest actor to take over the role of Doctor Who, and the fact that this undoubtedly estimable thespian just so happens to be female. Many of us have been asked the question

"Would you prefer a male or female doctor"

at one time or another, and quite honestly I think the Beeb have missed a trick, and that an opportunity for a full-blown plebiscite has been lost. Imagine the build up, hustings, debates, polls about polls about exit polls and a blow by blow run down as the nation decides this matter of the gravest constitutional importance.

Perhaps it would result in another 52/48, with the wrong choice of Doctor Who ruining the future for our children and grandchildren, or maybe Jeremy Corbyn could be the successor to the time lord, which would for a whole variety of reasons probably bring great joy to a great many people.

I remember watching Doctor Who when I was about eight years old, when the ever-so-slightly camp John Pertwee inhabited the title role, and a year or so later the return of the daleks made the cover of the Radio Times, although my recollection is that it didn't trouble the autocue of Reginald Bosanquet and Sandy Gall so much as once. I'm sure John Craven's Newsround would have covered it and possibly Newsbeat on Radio 1, two strands that had been introduced to foster an interest in current affairs amongst younger people, which is a perfectly worthy undertaking, though personally I had long been a devotee of ITN news, primarily because the theme music was so good.

Back then the distinction between children's programmes and the rest of the broadcast output was perfectly clear, and your parents would watch you watching them, with occasional interjections along the lines of

"That's nice dear"

when one's excitement had risen to fever pitch as Joe 90 had single-handedly thwarted an international spy ring with nothing more than a pair of special glasses.

 Nowadays though it seems that certain children's programmes, of which Doctor Who is perhaps the standout example, are watched and taken quite seriously by a much broader age range of viewer, in much the same way as it is hardly unprecedented to see men in business suits reading Harry Potter novels in first class train carriages. I can remember probably exactly forty years ago when at school we each had to talk about our hobbies (I talked about drums and big band jazz it won't surprise you to learn) one classmate talked about the DWAS (Doctor Who Appreciation Society, Paul Tipton was his name as it happens) and was chastised in a torrent of adolescent vitriol by the entire class for his lack of maturity in choice of viewing, the collective opinion being that it was 'for children'.

Personally the fourteen year old me couldn't wait to grow up, put on a good suit and learn to drive a car. I admired grown up music and grown up women, but with just days remaining until the fortieth anniversary (August 1977) of my first 'grown up' gig with adult musicians and for proper money I can't help but contemplate how different what the world had to offer was, and if what we had to look forward to was in some ways better.


Sunday, 16 July 2017

Rock, paper, sticks.

If you are not a drummer stop reading this now.
Do something else, make something nice to eat, read a book, walk the dog or watch TV.

Okay, now they've all gone we can continue.

So, tell me, what sort of sticks do you use?

Now tell me why.
I've used the same model for at least a decade. They're very traditional, general purpose, useful in pretty much any situation and medium weight, a bit like me in other words.



But there's a problem.
They're no longer 'the ones'. My unswerving fidelity and occasional passion for this model has disappeared like Charles Ryder's love for the army.

I started on a new batch and nothing seemed right, to the point where last night I kept picking up different pairs throughout the show trying to find something that felt right and would enable me to play as I wished, but to no avail.

The epiphany occured during the drive back to Suusex when I realised that it's not them, it's me. I've outgrown them and it has been a long, slow process the first steps of which were taken in 2002.

That year I had the call to replace the legendary Ronnie Verrell in the Best of British Jazz group. It felt like being elevated to the peerage. They could have had anyone they wanted and they asked me. Wow.

It was very much a part of the show to include a big and lengthy drum solo towards the end of the night and one particular evening in Radlett I decided that I needed to do something.
By the time the drum feature came around my hands were tired. Not serious pain so much as an aching fatigue, but it was enough to prompt me to take action. I went home from that show and commenced the process of completely dismantling and rebuilding my chops, with no guarantee of a result. Scary.
It was a while coming but the key step was to make the fulcrum as relaxed as possible, and even more importantly that when the stick strikes the playing surface there should be absolutely no tension.

I often refer to this as a 'soft landing' and here's a little video about it from last year. A more comprehensive explanation of this and related concepts will be included in my forthcoming DVD.


The next step was to shift from a two finger 'pinch point' and develop what I like to call the enhanced fulcrum. This involves gripping and supporting the stick through the whole hand, with particular emphasis on developing the role of the middle and ring fingers. Nothing new there, lots of players do this already,  but the difference is that I do this with traditional grip and have developed the ability to actually change the fulcrum whilst playing. It has brought with it a whole new take on finger control too.

Has it made me play any faster? Probably not but I'm not all that bothered. The difference it has made is to my endurance, control and quality of sound, but my hands have developed such strength that I'm going to have to find a bigger stick, as the 5A feels like a knitting needle now.

Beacause of the quest for complete relaxation all the energy is at the beginning of each stroke, effectively I'm throwing the sticks at the instrument, but my very closed yet ultra relaxed hold on the sticks means they stay under control, but finding the optimum weight and density is the task now. Years ago I discovered a particular maple stick favoured by the late, great Bob Armstrong and I used them for ages. About two weeks ago I happened to pick up a pair at Lee Smith's studio and it was like trying to play with two feather dusters, way too light.

Just like clothes and shoe size your sticks should fit you. If you are fortunate enough that the signature model of your favourite player works for you then that's great, but you are not built like them and what meets their various needs may not be right for you. You may have to accept the uncomfortable truth that the signature model of a player whose band and style you absolutely loathe suits your hands perfectly. Deal with it.

And that reminds me of my friend Steve Celentano. Steve's Dad was part of the security detail to a certain Francis Albert Sinatra and one day Steve and a pal has gone along with Pop to where the Chairman was performing a show. Sinatra would use touring bands augmented with his own section leaders, rhythm section and conductor and the Count Basie Orchestra was the band of choice this particular day. When no one was looking Steve and his pal purloined drum sticks off Harold Jones's floor tom, and a couple of years ago Steve sent the sticks to me as a gift. They are Rogers Buddy Rich model and I couldn't play with them if my life depended upon it. They're so light I feel like they're not there, but when you consider the power and virtuosity in evidence on the Swinging New Big Band and Big Swing Face records, to say nothing of the legendary 5am collaboration with Sammy Davis Jnr, all quite probably using a stick that I can't even feel, it just goes to prove the point that all of this is about personal preference, and just because one of your heroes favours something does not mean it will work for you. Be influenced and admire, but be yourself and make your own choices.



So I'm sitting here wondering what sort of stick will fit the bill. Should I go back to oak, following a casual dalliance in the 1990s? My hands are extremely large so weight and density are pivotal. Here's a picture of one of them.......



I think half a day at Bell Percussion is probably going to be called for, meanwhile I'm conducting an experiment into mass and velocity using a screwed up ball of paper, a small rock and a wood tip 5A.

For details about any of my bands, guest appearances, private lessons, masterclasses etc, contact me here